“At the edge between the known and the unknown there is a fertile place, full of possibility”
Steven D’Souza

Welcome to the sixth post in the “3 Good Reads for PM” series. In each post I provide a brief and personal commentary on three articles, books or web posts that, in my opinion, could help project managers and project planners in their profession.
The reads chosen for this post are articles & resources related to some theoretical aspects of Project Management and a useful guide to Logical Framework approach. Maybe an original mix this month? I welcome any constructive feedback or suggestions.
From projectification to programmification
Harvey Maylor, Tim Brady, Terry Cooke-Davies, Damian Hodgson; International Journal of Project Management, Volume 24, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 663-674, ISSN 0263-7863
This old but interesting paper considers two key themes from the activities of the ‘Rethinking Project Management Network’, a UK Government-funded research network called funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council between 2004 and 2006. The two themes are: ‘projectification‘ and managing multiple projects. Following analysis of cases presented during network meetings, the findings discuss the development of the concept of ‘projectification‘ over the decades before 2006. Some of the key conclusions drawn are that, for example, ‘projectification‘ has considerably extended the definition of a ‘project’, way beyond the definitions in the literature. Importantly, during the decade reviewed by this paper, the authors have seen the establishment of programmes and portfolios of programmes as a mechanism for managing in organisations. This translated into a fundamental change in how organisations have restructured, a phenomenon the authors term as ‘programmification‘. According to the authors, these conclusions had implications for research and practice, which reflected in a research agenda and specific research questions that are still very relevant today.
Why this one?
This article is clearly for those with a specific interest in the science of project management. Interesting for me it is the commentary on how the organisations have morphed from a purely “functional” structure to a purely “project-based” arrangement. The examples in the article are from the automotive sector, a sector which seemed to have championed the change. The authors’ analysis also spans over other industries and it is very informative. It gives an insight on why modern organisations are set in the way they are today.
I think that some of the questions that the authors pose at the end of the article, and intended to form part of future research, are still very relevant today, and still waiting for a proper answer.
A quick guide to the Project DPro
“Project DPro” was developed in partnership with ‘Project Management for NGOs’ (PM4NGOs), an organization dedicated to optimizing projects and improving professional project management skills in the development sector. The Project DPro is an approach to project management aligned with internationally recognized project management best practices and it includes components specific to the NGO sector. Project DPro is meant to help project managers develop the skills needed to deliver effective, transparent results to donors and communities.
This brief guide provides an introductory, independent exploration of project management within the context of the development sector, explaining the approach of Project DPro. [There is now also a Foundation Examination on Project DPro available from APMG. More information can be found here.]
Why this one?
The Project DPro model can probably be easily incorporated into already existing project lifecycles or can stand alone if a lifecycle is not available within an organization. It uses a phase model approach, and this guide provides guidance on what ought to be covered in each phase of the project. The model has 5 phases: Identification & Design, Setup, Planning, Implementation and Closure.
The short guide is very informative about the structure of each phase, using a clear ‘Inputs-> Process-> Outputs’ logic explaining also very clearly roles and responsibilities. Project DPro emphases five principles for project management: Well-Governed, Participatory, Comprehensive, Integrated, and Adaptive. They are pillars for a good project delivery in the development sector. These are very well contextualised and illustrated in the guide.
The logical framework approach
This short guide was provided during a course on Logical Framework organised by the Scotland’s International Development Alliance. The guide is not publicly available, and BOND are now advertising a dedicated course: “How to use the logical framework approach to design projects”.
Why this one?
This guide is good in pointing the reader to the essentials of the logical framework, putting the elements in practice. BOND also presents the pros and cons of the approach, in recognition to the fact that the approach is used in very different ways by various international organisations and it receives both praise and criticism. Should your organisation require a briefing on the approach or a training session, it would be really worthwhile to reach out to BOND for guidance.
Marco Bottacini, Senior Portfolio Manager at GALVmed
The views and opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinion of GALVmed.























